UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND STUDENT COURSEWORK ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT AND PLAGIARISM RULES

The Vice-Chancellor shall receive the papers of the initial investigation and appeal but shall not receive representations when making a decision. The burden of proof shall be the balance of probability and not proof beyond reasonable doubt. Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties. It includes corporations and other bodies falling into one or more of these categories.

The examination may be a supervised written examination or a viva voce examination. Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. A copy of a reprimand will be held on the student’s individual file. At the end of each academic year the Records Manager will submit a report to the Academic Board listing by School the number of investigations that were carried out. The burden of proof shall be the balance of probability and not proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Student Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism (Coursework) Rule

They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties. The Support Person must not be a member of the legal profession. The Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer has authority to uphold the penalty, or refer the penalty to the Student Conduct Appeals Committee for reconsideration as appropriate. hew

The report must be made within five working days of the alleged incident occurring or being identified. The examination may be a supervised written examination or a viva voce examination.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule / UNE Policy Register System

The University does not tolerate dishonesty and impropriety in academic work and imposes strict penalties on any student found to have acted dishonestly or improperly in assessment processes. Good scholarship refers to and builds upon the work of others. They may uphold an appeal riles uphold the penalties.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit. The records must be retained for at least ten years after the student’s graduation from the University. The file must be created by the Records Management Office and stored in line with University policy.

  LITERATURE REVIEW KOMUNIKASI BERKESAN

Section 1 – Overviews 1 These procedures outline the implementation of the Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule “the Rule” and must be read in conjunction with that Rule.

Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: The Vice-Chancellor shall receive the papers of the initial investigation and appeal but shall not receive representations when making a decision. At the end of each academic year the Records Manager will submit a report to the Academic Board listing by School the number of investigations that were carried out. Where it is suspected that a submitted assessment task, or part thereof, has not been written by the Student the Unit Coordinator may ask the Investigating Officer to arrange an examination on the relevant topic as part of the process of determination of authorship.

The University does not tolerate dishonesty and impropriety in academic work and imposes strict penalties on any student found to have acted dishonestly or improperly in assessment processes.

Late responses shall be handled as appeals. A copy of a reprimand will be held on the student’s individual file. The Appeal Officer or Committee Chair will forward a report Template A6 and all associated documents to the Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer who will review the case but not receive representations when making a decision.

Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation. Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. This Declaration affirms that the student agrees that:.

New evidence should not be accepted unless it can be demonstrated that is was not available at the original investigation. If the Appeal Officer or Committee Chair decides that the appeal should be dismissed, the appellant will be informed of the details and reasons for the decision and all avenues of appeal within the University will then be exhausted.

  SENIOR THESIS TLUMACZENIE

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule

An Authorised Appeals Officer must not have been involved in the initial investigation or determination of the case. Late responses shall be handled as appeals.

This report should also specify the nature of the penalty and the final decision-maker in each instance. Assessment tasks can be designed for diagnostic, formative, summative, evaluative or informative purposes.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

A new penalty applied under these circumstances may be appealed in accordance with these Procedures. Where the Academic Director courseowrk also the Unit Coordinator, the Head of School or nominee is authorised to investigate and impose penalties.

Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: Excluded students do not have an automatic right of re-admission. Student Assist can advise any University Member or member of the public on how to make a formal complaint.

The studetn must be retained for at least ten years after the student’s graduation from the University. The author and the source must be identified clearly whenever the ideas, words, drawings, designs, data, computer programs, performances or creative works of others are used.

It includes corporations and other bodies falling into one or more of these categories.