It is now the American right of Donald Trump that attacks free trade, common currencies, outsourcing and offshoring, open borders, the media, elites, and so on. The chapters deals with the dominance of media in international markets, thus making the American ideal, the global ideal. I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in American foreign policy and the challenges we face moving forward, especially as our society moves more and more toward corporatism. The resistance is often ugly, misinformed and desperate–and it will continue. Also if one wants to, one can block out advertisement with the new technology of DVR, one can ignore advertisements of one chooses. Jun 09, Justin Dell rated it really liked it.

People resist, again, both as groups and as individuals, or, often out of fear, they are co-opted into the system. There is value in this book, but it is not necessarily found in the disappointingly s Provocative, but not incendiary. Barber describes the solidarity needed within the concept of Jihad as being secured through exclusion and war against outsiders. He states its a bad thing that corporations take advantage of social issues in order to market itself. I could’ve honestly rated the book higher if it weren’t dedicated to a certain audience namely students of politics or seasoned professors of geo-politics and economics of I which I felt excluded

Barber’s analysis of the current world situation seems sad but basically true. Refresh and try again. What he fails to realize in my view is that a capitalist system provides an environment in which liberal democracy can thrive once a majority of people of that country have a vibrant middle class. Both react against, but also mutually reinforce, one another. Of course as industries mature, we will get foreign competition from abroad so the best course of action is to let economics play out and just create new global industries into which we dominate.

I do not think that oil companies will ever go out of business even without American government backing given the rise of the global middle class, they will always find customers willing to fuel their business.

There is value in this book, but it is not necessarily found in the disappointingly s Provocative, but not incendiary.

Review: Jihad vs McWorld by Benjamin R Barber | Books | The Guardian

There is no morality argument here about which side is good and which side is bad, merely the presentation that both sides exist and that one comes as a reaction to the other.


I do think that the title is problematic, jihqd just because Jihad seems to point only to Islam as the model for nationalism and identity politics, but mostly because vss simply is an inadequate description of what he is trying to describe.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The nation-state would play a diminished role, and sovereignty would lose some of its political potency.

I told you so

McWorld is a groundbreaking work, an elegant and illuminating analysis of the vx conflict of our times: Dec 26, Carol Storm rated it it was amazing. Add to that social media’s general shrinking of the world and expanding of our ability to socialize. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Jihad and McWorld can co-exist in fact, jihad might be impossible without the jlhad of McWorld but the true victim of this struggle is democracy, to which both forces are opposed.

Jihad vs. McWorld – Wikipedia

In Russia at least the early capitalist reform and the resultant increase in organized crime and unemployment caused a significant backlash that resulted in present government and economy that has facade of a democratic market-system but is actually a state-run oligarchy head by Putin, the strong man behind the power.

And there is much to cheer in Barber’s analysis. In the international arena, he advocates the formation of Confederation of ethnicities at their heart having civic mcwolrd that has its heart engaged citizens in order to have a foundational basis for democratic institutions.

I think more and more American prowess in the economy will heavily rely on an innovative entrepreneurial spirit that can create new industries and thus new jobs. The list, Barber points out, is jiuad similar to that of William Prynne’s 17th-century tirade, Histriomastix ; but it is at this point that Mxworld seems most to sigh for the moral purity that we have lost while playing Nintendo and eating cheeseburgers.

He backs up in the Afterword, saying he just didn’t understand that people would take such offense to his misuse of the word Jihad to mean people in European countries daring to demand you speak Catalan in the Catalan universities, and that he really does like Muslim people, honest.


thesis of jihad vs mcworld

For example, he devotes about as much time to Quebecois and Basque separatism as all of Asia. These safety nets, however, are often lacking at the international level, leading to “wild capitalism” that has seriously thesix up certain countries Russia, for instance. The chapters deals with the dominance of media in international markets, thus making the American ideal, the global ideal. McWorld by Benjamin R.

thesis of jihad vs mcworld

Once the images changes, then Hollywood films will change and thus American cultural images will change too. He points out that Islam has no word for “democracy” and has to use the Greek term. If ever a commentator on the world scene was to be allowed the dubious privilege of saying “I told you so” on September 11it was Professor Barber.

Barber states that even though the US is losing the deficit war in terms of manufacturing jobs, and possibly soft ware jobs, we are winning the war in terms of new service jobs of the 21st century because like always we create an industry out of thin air and run with it.

Barber’s book, which is a kind of riposte to Fukuyama’s and similarly began life as an article in this case, in the March issue of Atlantic Monthlywas published in America in LitFlash The eBooks you want at the lowest prices.

thesis of jihad vs mcworld

Some readers will inevitably find Barber’s dialectic between those two rhesis way tinted with not so fresh winds of Marxist dialectical analysis. Other than through this venue, I would not have cared about the environment because that is not my inherent interest. This does not take a genius to come up with this statement because the global supply-chain makes sure that America is interdependent with other countries for its needs. As neoliberal economic theory —not to be confused with social liberalism —is the force behind globalization, this critique is relevant on a much larger scale.