Management of salinity issues in Iraq’s agricultural sector. Rank each of the factors as 1 to 4 company strategies in the next stage should be controlled based on this output score 1 is the poorest reaction and 7 is the best reaction and 2 is average reaction and 3 is above average. These areas and Threats: Then, the collected information was classified and a list of the most important weaknesses and strengths, threats and opportunities was provided and for re-evaluation was presented to the founders of company and then the mean of their comments was used for data analysis. Comprehensive model of strategic management Internal evaluation Organizationa l horizon and mission Long-term goals Analysis and selection of strategies Strategy implement ation managem ent issues Strategy impleme ntation Evaluation of performance quality External evaluation Figure 1- Comprehensive framework of strategy formulating Arabi, 6- Mission The production and supply of excellent sanitary ware in Iran and Middle East markets for the consumers of sanitary and ceramic ware consumers, to provide the stable profit for the stockholders via making customers happy, using knowledge-based structure and committed employees and useful interaction with business partners and social responsibility. International conference of management, innovation and national production. The result of all the analyses as internal environment analysis of strengths S , weakness of organization W are shown in IFE matrix of Figure 6.

In this study, agricultural sector and animal husbandry strategies are determined simultaneously. An analysis of the retail industry. Skip to main content. Introduction while respecting organization values we embark to strategic There is no doubt that the world of today is much more decision makings through combined a nalysis of different than the past. For complaints, use another form.

The highest number is 4, lowest 1 and the mean is 2.


qspm case study

In one side of this matrix the strengths and weaknesses of the organization are located and on studj other side the opportunities and threat 4. Now, the task is to compare in QSPM alternative strategies and decide which one is the most suitable for our goals. The general weight sum of ranks is obtained this ranks weight show the general condition of organizations.

Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)

The table bellow shows a list of 8 most recent topics posted in our discussion forum. Add this document to saved. Skip to main content.

qspm case study

Strategic management is defined as a set of management decisions and actions that determine a company’s long-term performance and lead and control the organization so that it can quickly respond to some internal and external environmental qsom.

Lacking agility for exploiting market opportunities 0.

This matrix was introduced in by Albert Hamfry Parhizgar et al. If the key factor does studj affect the choice being made at all, then the Attractiveness Score would be 0.

Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)

International Journal of agricultural Management and Development is licensed under a. This process is very much intuitive and subjective.

Lacking appropriate financial engineering 0. Testing the validity of blue ocean strategy versus competitive strategy: The present study attempted to identify and introduce sanitary ware of Golsar Fars and then the information is analyzed.

Give weight ranging 0,1 the sum of weights is 1. The importance of strategic planning.

Strategic Planning of Transportation in Iran Using SWOT and QSPM , Case study : Yazd City

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5 1 The sum of weights should be equal to 1. All articles are protected by copyright and have been archived at a national library.


qspm case study

SWOT is an acronym of internal strengths and weaknesses of business and environment opportunities and threats Parhizgar et al. For survival in these markets, we need exact identification of our environment to respond to its changes, if necessary Abasi et al.

At first, the important factors of success in this industry are listed and a weight ranging 0,1 is given to them.

Finally, the following strategies were extracted and were prioritized based on 2.

Formulating strategy by SWOT and QSPM matrix (case study

Total Attractiveness Scores czse defined as the product of multiplying the weights step 3 by the Attractiveness Scores step 4 in each row.

In this stage, the type of activity of company, the activities being eliminate, resources allocation method, decision making about development or variety of activities are done David, It is used to determine what type It means that all internal and external affective aspects and variables should 2. International Journal of Scientific Management and Development Therefore we would be able to determine relative 2.

Then, each of the factors are ranked as 1,4, do it for your company and the competitor company. Some human resources that leave the shudy and cooperating with competitors.

This is given by the Sum Total Attractiveness Score figure. In the study of macro factors by PEST method, four macro factors political, economic, social and technological are estimated.